/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 *
 * costsize.c
 *	  Routines to compute (and set) relation sizes and path costs
 *
 * Path costs are measured in arbitrary units established by these basic
 * parameters:
 *
 *	seq_page_cost		Cost of a sequential page fetch
 *	random_page_cost	Cost of a non-sequential page fetch
 *	cpu_tuple_cost		Cost of typical CPU time to process a tuple
 *	cpu_index_tuple_cost  Cost of typical CPU time to process an index tuple
 *	cpu_operator_cost	Cost of CPU time to execute an operator or function
 *
 * We expect that the kernel will typically do some amount of read-ahead
 * optimization; this in conjunction with seek costs means that seq_page_cost
 * is normally considerably less than random_page_cost.  (However, if the
 * database is fully cached in RAM, it is reasonable to set them equal.)
 *
 * We also use a rough estimate "effective_cache_size" of the number of
 * disk pages in Postgres + OS-level disk cache.  (We can't simply use
 * NBuffers for this purpose because that would ignore the effects of
 * the kernel's disk cache.)
 *
 * Obviously, taking constants for these values is an oversimplification,
 * but it's tough enough to get any useful estimates even at this level of
 * detail.  Note that all of these parameters are user-settable, in case
 * the default values are drastically off for a particular platform.
 *
 * We compute two separate costs for each path:
 *		total_cost: total estimated cost to fetch all tuples
 *		startup_cost: cost that is expended before first tuple is fetched
 * In some scenarios, such as when there is a LIMIT or we are implementing
 * an EXISTS(...) sub-select, it is not necessary to fetch all tuples of the
 * path's result.  A caller can estimate the cost of fetching a partial
 * result by interpolating between startup_cost and total_cost.  In detail:
 *		actual_cost = startup_cost +
 *			(total_cost - startup_cost) * tuples_to_fetch / path->parent->rows;
 * Note that a base relation's rows count (and, by extension, plan_rows for
 * plan nodes below the LIMIT node) are set without regard to any LIMIT, so
 * that this equation works properly.  (Also, these routines guarantee not to
 * set the rows count to zero, so there will be no zero divide.)  The LIMIT is
 * applied as a top-level plan node.
 *
 * For largely historical reasons, most of the routines in this module use
 * the passed result Path only to store their startup_cost and total_cost
 * results into.  All the input data they need is passed as separate
 * parameters, even though much of it could be extracted from the Path.
 * An exception is made for the cost_XXXjoin() routines, which expect all
 * the non-cost fields of the passed XXXPath to be filled in.
 *
 *
 * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2009, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
 * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
 *
 * IDENTIFICATION
 *	  $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c,v 1.209.2.1 2009/07/11 04:09:40 tgl Exp $
 *
 *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 */

#include "postgres.h"

#include <math.h>

#include "executor/nodeHash.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h"
#include "optimizer/clauses.h"
#include "optimizer/cost.h"
#include "optimizer/pathnode.h"
#include "optimizer/placeholder.h"
#include "optimizer/planmain.h"
#include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h"
#include "parser/parsetree.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
#include "utils/selfuncs.h"
#include "utils/tuplesort.h"


#define LOG2(x)  (log(x) / 0.693147180559945)

/*
 * Some Paths return less than the nominal number of rows of their parent
 * relations; join nodes need to do this to get the correct input count:
 */
#define PATH_ROWS(path) \
	(IsA(path, UniquePath) ? \
	 ((UniquePath *) (path))->rows : \
	 (path)->parent->rows)


double		seq_page_cost = DEFAULT_SEQ_PAGE_COST;
double		random_page_cost = DEFAULT_RANDOM_PAGE_COST;
double		cpu_tuple_cost = DEFAULT_CPU_TUPLE_COST;
double		cpu_index_tuple_cost = DEFAULT_CPU_INDEX_TUPLE_COST;
double		cpu_operator_cost = DEFAULT_CPU_OPERATOR_COST;

int			effective_cache_size = DEFAULT_EFFECTIVE_CACHE_SIZE;

Cost		disable_cost = 1.0e10;

bool		enable_seqscan = true;
bool		enable_indexscan = true;
bool		enable_bitmapscan = true;
bool		enable_tidscan = true;
bool		enable_sort = true;
bool		enable_hashagg = true;
bool		enable_nestloop = true;
bool		enable_mergejoin = true;
bool		enable_hashjoin = true;

typedef struct
{
	PlannerInfo *root;
	QualCost	total;
} cost_qual_eval_context;

static MergeScanSelCache *cached_scansel(PlannerInfo *root,
			   RestrictInfo *rinfo,
			   PathKey *pathkey);
static bool cost_qual_eval_walker(Node *node, cost_qual_eval_context *context);
static bool adjust_semi_join(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path,
				 SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo,
				 Selectivity *outer_match_frac,
				 Selectivity *match_count,
				 bool *indexed_join_quals);
static double approx_tuple_count(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path,
				   List *quals);
static void set_rel_width(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel);
static double relation_byte_size(double tuples, int width);
static double page_size(double tuples, int width);


/*
 * clamp_row_est
 *		Force a row-count estimate to a sane value.
 */
double
clamp_row_est(double nrows)
{
	/*
	 * Force estimate to be at least one row, to make explain output look
	 * better and to avoid possible divide-by-zero when interpolating costs.
	 * Make it an integer, too.
	 */
	if (nrows <= 1.0)
		nrows = 1.0;
	else
		nrows = rint(nrows);

	return nrows;
}


/*
 * cost_seqscan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation sequentially.
 */
void
cost_seqscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
			 RelOptInfo *baserel)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations */
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION);

	if (!enable_seqscan)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * disk costs
	 */
	run_cost += seq_page_cost * baserel->pages;

	/* CPU costs */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_index
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using an index.
 *
 * 'index' is the index to be used
 * 'indexQuals' is the list of applicable qual clauses (implicit AND semantics)
 * 'outer_rel' is the outer relation when we are considering using the index
 *		scan as the inside of a nestloop join (hence, some of the indexQuals
 *		are join clauses, and we should expect repeated scans of the index);
 *		NULL for a plain index scan
 *
 * cost_index() takes an IndexPath not just a Path, because it sets a few
 * additional fields of the IndexPath besides startup_cost and total_cost.
 * These fields are needed if the IndexPath is used in a BitmapIndexScan.
 *
 * NOTE: 'indexQuals' must contain only clauses usable as index restrictions.
 * Any additional quals evaluated as qpquals may reduce the number of returned
 * tuples, but they won't reduce the number of tuples we have to fetch from
 * the table, so they don't reduce the scan cost.
 *
 * NOTE: as of 8.0, indexQuals is a list of RestrictInfo nodes, where formerly
 * it was a list of bare clause expressions.
 */
void
cost_index(IndexPath *path, PlannerInfo *root,
		   IndexOptInfo *index,
		   List *indexQuals,
		   RelOptInfo *outer_rel)
{
	RelOptInfo *baserel = index->rel;
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		indexStartupCost;
	Cost		indexTotalCost;
	Selectivity indexSelectivity;
	double		indexCorrelation,
				csquared;
	Cost		min_IO_cost,
				max_IO_cost;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	double		tuples_fetched;
	double		pages_fetched;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations */
	Assert(IsA(baserel, RelOptInfo) &&
		   IsA(index, IndexOptInfo));
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION);

	if (!enable_indexscan)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * Call index-access-method-specific code to estimate the processing cost
	 * for scanning the index, as well as the selectivity of the index (ie,
	 * the fraction of main-table tuples we will have to retrieve) and its
	 * correlation to the main-table tuple order.
	 */
	OidFunctionCall8(index->amcostestimate,
					 PointerGetDatum(root),
					 PointerGetDatum(index),
					 PointerGetDatum(indexQuals),
					 PointerGetDatum(outer_rel),
					 PointerGetDatum(&indexStartupCost),
					 PointerGetDatum(&indexTotalCost),
					 PointerGetDatum(&indexSelectivity),
					 PointerGetDatum(&indexCorrelation));

	/*
	 * Save amcostestimate's results for possible use in bitmap scan planning.
	 * We don't bother to save indexStartupCost or indexCorrelation, because a
	 * bitmap scan doesn't care about either.
	 */
	path->indextotalcost = indexTotalCost;
	path->indexselectivity = indexSelectivity;

	/* all costs for touching index itself included here */
	startup_cost += indexStartupCost;
	run_cost += indexTotalCost - indexStartupCost;

	/* estimate number of main-table tuples fetched */
	tuples_fetched = clamp_row_est(indexSelectivity * baserel->tuples);

	/*----------
	 * Estimate number of main-table pages fetched, and compute I/O cost.
	 *
	 * When the index ordering is uncorrelated with the table ordering,
	 * we use an approximation proposed by Mackert and Lohman (see
	 * index_pages_fetched() for details) to compute the number of pages
	 * fetched, and then charge random_page_cost per page fetched.
	 *
	 * When the index ordering is exactly correlated with the table ordering
	 * (just after a CLUSTER, for example), the number of pages fetched should
	 * be exactly selectivity * table_size.  What's more, all but the first
	 * will be sequential fetches, not the random fetches that occur in the
	 * uncorrelated case.  So if the number of pages is more than 1, we
	 * ought to charge
	 *		random_page_cost + (pages_fetched - 1) * seq_page_cost
	 * For partially-correlated indexes, we ought to charge somewhere between
	 * these two estimates.  We currently interpolate linearly between the
	 * estimates based on the correlation squared (XXX is that appropriate?).
	 *----------
	 */
	if (outer_rel != NULL && outer_rel->rows > 1)
	{
		/*
		 * For repeated indexscans, the appropriate estimate for the
		 * uncorrelated case is to scale up the number of tuples fetched in
		 * the Mackert and Lohman formula by the number of scans, so that we
		 * estimate the number of pages fetched by all the scans; then
		 * pro-rate the costs for one scan.  In this case we assume all the
		 * fetches are random accesses.
		 */
		double		num_scans = outer_rel->rows;

		pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(tuples_fetched * num_scans,
											baserel->pages,
											(double) index->pages,
											root);

		max_IO_cost = (pages_fetched * random_page_cost) / num_scans;

		/*
		 * In the perfectly correlated case, the number of pages touched by
		 * each scan is selectivity * table_size, and we can use the Mackert
		 * and Lohman formula at the page level to estimate how much work is
		 * saved by caching across scans.  We still assume all the fetches are
		 * random, though, which is an overestimate that's hard to correct for
		 * without double-counting the cache effects.  (But in most cases
		 * where such a plan is actually interesting, only one page would get
		 * fetched per scan anyway, so it shouldn't matter much.)
		 */
		pages_fetched = ceil(indexSelectivity * (double) baserel->pages);

		pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(pages_fetched * num_scans,
											baserel->pages,
											(double) index->pages,
											root);

		min_IO_cost = (pages_fetched * random_page_cost) / num_scans;
	}
	else
	{
		/*
		 * Normal case: apply the Mackert and Lohman formula, and then
		 * interpolate between that and the correlation-derived result.
		 */
		pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(tuples_fetched,
											baserel->pages,
											(double) index->pages,
											root);

		/* max_IO_cost is for the perfectly uncorrelated case (csquared=0) */
		max_IO_cost = pages_fetched * random_page_cost;

		/* min_IO_cost is for the perfectly correlated case (csquared=1) */
		pages_fetched = ceil(indexSelectivity * (double) baserel->pages);
		min_IO_cost = random_page_cost;
		if (pages_fetched > 1)
			min_IO_cost += (pages_fetched - 1) * seq_page_cost;
	}

	/*
	 * Now interpolate based on estimated index order correlation to get total
	 * disk I/O cost for main table accesses.
	 */
	csquared = indexCorrelation * indexCorrelation;

	run_cost += max_IO_cost + csquared * (min_IO_cost - max_IO_cost);

	/*
	 * Estimate CPU costs per tuple.
	 *
	 * Normally the indexquals will be removed from the list of restriction
	 * clauses that we have to evaluate as qpquals, so we should subtract
	 * their costs from baserestrictcost.  But if we are doing a join then
	 * some of the indexquals are join clauses and shouldn't be subtracted.
	 * Rather than work out exactly how much to subtract, we don't subtract
	 * anything.
	 *
	 * XXX actually, this calculation is almost completely bogus, because
	 * indexquals will contain derived indexable conditions which might be
	 * quite different from the "original" quals in baserestrictinfo.  We
	 * ought to determine the actual qpqual list and cost that, rather than
	 * using this shortcut.  But that's too invasive a change to consider
	 * back-patching, so for the moment we just mask the worst aspects of the
	 * problem by clamping the subtracted amount.
	 */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;

	if (outer_rel == NULL)
	{
		QualCost	index_qual_cost;

		cost_qual_eval(&index_qual_cost, indexQuals, root);
		/* any startup cost still has to be paid ... */
		cpu_per_tuple -= Min(index_qual_cost.per_tuple,
							 baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple);
	}

	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * tuples_fetched;

	path->path.startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * index_pages_fetched
 *	  Estimate the number of pages actually fetched after accounting for
 *	  cache effects.
 *
 * We use an approximation proposed by Mackert and Lohman, "Index Scans
 * Using a Finite LRU Buffer: A Validated I/O Model", ACM Transactions
 * on Database Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, September 1989, Pages 401-424.
 * The Mackert and Lohman approximation is that the number of pages
 * fetched is
 *	PF =
 *		min(2TNs/(2T+Ns), T)			when T <= b
 *		2TNs/(2T+Ns)					when T > b and Ns <= 2Tb/(2T-b)
 *		b + (Ns - 2Tb/(2T-b))*(T-b)/T	when T > b and Ns > 2Tb/(2T-b)
 * where
 *		T = # pages in table
 *		N = # tuples in table
 *		s = selectivity = fraction of table to be scanned
 *		b = # buffer pages available (we include kernel space here)
 *
 * We assume that effective_cache_size is the total number of buffer pages
 * available for the whole query, and pro-rate that space across all the
 * tables in the query and the index currently under consideration.  (This
 * ignores space needed for other indexes used by the query, but since we
 * don't know which indexes will get used, we can't estimate that very well;
 * and in any case counting all the tables may well be an overestimate, since
 * depending on the join plan not all the tables may be scanned concurrently.)
 *
 * The product Ns is the number of tuples fetched; we pass in that
 * product rather than calculating it here.  "pages" is the number of pages
 * in the object under consideration (either an index or a table).
 * "index_pages" is the amount to add to the total table space, which was
 * computed for us by query_planner.
 *
 * Caller is expected to have ensured that tuples_fetched is greater than zero
 * and rounded to integer (see clamp_row_est).  The result will likewise be
 * greater than zero and integral.
 */
double
index_pages_fetched(double tuples_fetched, BlockNumber pages,
					double index_pages, PlannerInfo *root)
{
	double		pages_fetched;
	double		total_pages;
	double		T,
				b;

	/* T is # pages in table, but don't allow it to be zero */
	T = (pages > 1) ? (double) pages : 1.0;

	/* Compute number of pages assumed to be competing for cache space */
	total_pages = root->total_table_pages + index_pages;
	total_pages = Max(total_pages, 1.0);
	Assert(T <= total_pages);

	/* b is pro-rated share of effective_cache_size */
	b = (double) effective_cache_size *T / total_pages;

	/* force it positive and integral */
	if (b <= 1.0)
		b = 1.0;
	else
		b = ceil(b);

	/* This part is the Mackert and Lohman formula */
	if (T <= b)
	{
		pages_fetched =
			(2.0 * T * tuples_fetched) / (2.0 * T + tuples_fetched);
		if (pages_fetched >= T)
			pages_fetched = T;
		else
			pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched);
	}
	else
	{
		double		lim;

		lim = (2.0 * T * b) / (2.0 * T - b);
		if (tuples_fetched <= lim)
		{
			pages_fetched =
				(2.0 * T * tuples_fetched) / (2.0 * T + tuples_fetched);
		}
		else
		{
			pages_fetched =
				b + (tuples_fetched - lim) * (T - b) / T;
		}
		pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched);
	}
	return pages_fetched;
}

/*
 * get_indexpath_pages
 *		Determine the total size of the indexes used in a bitmap index path.
 *
 * Note: if the same index is used more than once in a bitmap tree, we will
 * count it multiple times, which perhaps is the wrong thing ... but it's
 * not completely clear, and detecting duplicates is difficult, so ignore it
 * for now.
 */
static double
get_indexpath_pages(Path *bitmapqual)
{
	double		result = 0;
	ListCell   *l;

	if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapAndPath))
	{
		BitmapAndPath *apath = (BitmapAndPath *) bitmapqual;

		foreach(l, apath->bitmapquals)
		{
			result += get_indexpath_pages((Path *) lfirst(l));
		}
	}
	else if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapOrPath))
	{
		BitmapOrPath *opath = (BitmapOrPath *) bitmapqual;

		foreach(l, opath->bitmapquals)
		{
			result += get_indexpath_pages((Path *) lfirst(l));
		}
	}
	else if (IsA(bitmapqual, IndexPath))
	{
		IndexPath  *ipath = (IndexPath *) bitmapqual;

		result = (double) ipath->indexinfo->pages;
	}
	else
		elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d", nodeTag(bitmapqual));

	return result;
}

/*
 * cost_bitmap_heap_scan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using a bitmap
 *	  index-then-heap plan.
 *
 * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned
 * 'bitmapqual' is a tree of IndexPaths, BitmapAndPaths, and BitmapOrPaths
 * 'outer_rel' is the outer relation when we are considering using the bitmap
 *		scan as the inside of a nestloop join (hence, some of the indexQuals
 *		are join clauses, and we should expect repeated scans of the table);
 *		NULL for a plain bitmap scan
 *
 * Note: if this is a join inner path, the component IndexPaths in bitmapqual
 * should have been costed accordingly.
 */
void
cost_bitmap_heap_scan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel,
					  Path *bitmapqual, RelOptInfo *outer_rel)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		indexTotalCost;
	Selectivity indexSelectivity;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	Cost		cost_per_page;
	double		tuples_fetched;
	double		pages_fetched;
	double		T;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations */
	Assert(IsA(baserel, RelOptInfo));
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION);

	if (!enable_bitmapscan)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * Fetch total cost of obtaining the bitmap, as well as its total
	 * selectivity.
	 */
	cost_bitmap_tree_node(bitmapqual, &indexTotalCost, &indexSelectivity);

	startup_cost += indexTotalCost;

	/*
	 * Estimate number of main-table pages fetched.
	 */
	tuples_fetched = clamp_row_est(indexSelectivity * baserel->tuples);

	T = (baserel->pages > 1) ? (double) baserel->pages : 1.0;

	if (outer_rel != NULL && outer_rel->rows > 1)
	{
		/*
		 * For repeated bitmap scans, scale up the number of tuples fetched in
		 * the Mackert and Lohman formula by the number of scans, so that we
		 * estimate the number of pages fetched by all the scans. Then
		 * pro-rate for one scan.
		 */
		double		num_scans = outer_rel->rows;

		pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(tuples_fetched * num_scans,
											baserel->pages,
											get_indexpath_pages(bitmapqual),
											root);
		pages_fetched /= num_scans;
	}
	else
	{
		/*
		 * For a single scan, the number of heap pages that need to be fetched
		 * is the same as the Mackert and Lohman formula for the case T <= b
		 * (ie, no re-reads needed).
		 */
		pages_fetched = (2.0 * T * tuples_fetched) / (2.0 * T + tuples_fetched);
	}
	if (pages_fetched >= T)
		pages_fetched = T;
	else
		pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched);

	/*
	 * For small numbers of pages we should charge random_page_cost apiece,
	 * while if nearly all the table's pages are being read, it's more
	 * appropriate to charge seq_page_cost apiece.  The effect is nonlinear,
	 * too. For lack of a better idea, interpolate like this to determine the
	 * cost per page.
	 */
	if (pages_fetched >= 2.0)
		cost_per_page = random_page_cost -
			(random_page_cost - seq_page_cost) * sqrt(pages_fetched / T);
	else
		cost_per_page = random_page_cost;

	run_cost += pages_fetched * cost_per_page;

	/*
	 * Estimate CPU costs per tuple.
	 *
	 * Often the indexquals don't need to be rechecked at each tuple ... but
	 * not always, especially not if there are enough tuples involved that the
	 * bitmaps become lossy.  For the moment, just assume they will be
	 * rechecked always.
	 */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;

	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * tuples_fetched;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_bitmap_tree_node
 *		Extract cost and selectivity from a bitmap tree node (index/and/or)
 */
void
cost_bitmap_tree_node(Path *path, Cost *cost, Selectivity *selec)
{
	if (IsA(path, IndexPath))
	{
		*cost = ((IndexPath *) path)->indextotalcost;
		*selec = ((IndexPath *) path)->indexselectivity;

		/*
		 * Charge a small amount per retrieved tuple to reflect the costs of
		 * manipulating the bitmap.  This is mostly to make sure that a bitmap
		 * scan doesn't look to be the same cost as an indexscan to retrieve a
		 * single tuple.
		 */
		*cost += 0.1 * cpu_operator_cost * ((IndexPath *) path)->rows;
	}
	else if (IsA(path, BitmapAndPath))
	{
		*cost = path->total_cost;
		*selec = ((BitmapAndPath *) path)->bitmapselectivity;
	}
	else if (IsA(path, BitmapOrPath))
	{
		*cost = path->total_cost;
		*selec = ((BitmapOrPath *) path)->bitmapselectivity;
	}
	else
	{
		elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d", nodeTag(path));
		*cost = *selec = 0;		/* keep compiler quiet */
	}
}

/*
 * cost_bitmap_and_node
 *		Estimate the cost of a BitmapAnd node
 *
 * Note that this considers only the costs of index scanning and bitmap
 * creation, not the eventual heap access.  In that sense the object isn't
 * truly a Path, but it has enough path-like properties (costs in particular)
 * to warrant treating it as one.
 */
void
cost_bitmap_and_node(BitmapAndPath *path, PlannerInfo *root)
{
	Cost		totalCost;
	Selectivity selec;
	ListCell   *l;

	/*
	 * We estimate AND selectivity on the assumption that the inputs are
	 * independent.  This is probably often wrong, but we don't have the info
	 * to do better.
	 *
	 * The runtime cost of the BitmapAnd itself is estimated at 100x
	 * cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_intersect needed.  Probably too small,
	 * definitely too simplistic?
	 */
	totalCost = 0.0;
	selec = 1.0;
	foreach(l, path->bitmapquals)
	{
		Path	   *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l);
		Cost		subCost;
		Selectivity subselec;

		cost_bitmap_tree_node(subpath, &subCost, &subselec);

		selec *= subselec;

		totalCost += subCost;
		if (l != list_head(path->bitmapquals))
			totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost;
	}
	path->bitmapselectivity = selec;
	path->path.startup_cost = totalCost;
	path->path.total_cost = totalCost;
}

/*
 * cost_bitmap_or_node
 *		Estimate the cost of a BitmapOr node
 *
 * See comments for cost_bitmap_and_node.
 */
void
cost_bitmap_or_node(BitmapOrPath *path, PlannerInfo *root)
{
	Cost		totalCost;
	Selectivity selec;
	ListCell   *l;

	/*
	 * We estimate OR selectivity on the assumption that the inputs are
	 * non-overlapping, since that's often the case in "x IN (list)" type
	 * situations.  Of course, we clamp to 1.0 at the end.
	 *
	 * The runtime cost of the BitmapOr itself is estimated at 100x
	 * cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_union needed.  Probably too small,
	 * definitely too simplistic?  We are aware that the tbm_unions are
	 * optimized out when the inputs are BitmapIndexScans.
	 */
	totalCost = 0.0;
	selec = 0.0;
	foreach(l, path->bitmapquals)
	{
		Path	   *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l);
		Cost		subCost;
		Selectivity subselec;

		cost_bitmap_tree_node(subpath, &subCost, &subselec);

		selec += subselec;

		totalCost += subCost;
		if (l != list_head(path->bitmapquals) &&
			!IsA(subpath, IndexPath))
			totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost;
	}
	path->bitmapselectivity = Min(selec, 1.0);
	path->path.startup_cost = totalCost;
	path->path.total_cost = totalCost;
}

/*
 * cost_tidscan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using TIDs.
 */
void
cost_tidscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
			 RelOptInfo *baserel, List *tidquals)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	bool		isCurrentOf = false;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	QualCost	tid_qual_cost;
	int			ntuples;
	ListCell   *l;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations */
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION);

	/* Count how many tuples we expect to retrieve */
	ntuples = 0;
	foreach(l, tidquals)
	{
		if (IsA(lfirst(l), ScalarArrayOpExpr))
		{
			/* Each element of the array yields 1 tuple */
			ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) lfirst(l);
			Node	   *arraynode = (Node *) lsecond(saop->args);

			ntuples += estimate_array_length(arraynode);
		}
		else if (IsA(lfirst(l), CurrentOfExpr))
		{
			/* CURRENT OF yields 1 tuple */
			isCurrentOf = true;
			ntuples++;
		}
		else
		{
			/* It's just CTID = something, count 1 tuple */
			ntuples++;
		}
	}

	/*
	 * We must force TID scan for WHERE CURRENT OF, because only nodeTidscan.c
	 * understands how to do it correctly.  Therefore, honor enable_tidscan
	 * only when CURRENT OF isn't present.  Also note that cost_qual_eval
	 * counts a CurrentOfExpr as having startup cost disable_cost, which we
	 * subtract off here; that's to prevent other plan types such as seqscan
	 * from winning.
	 */
	if (isCurrentOf)
	{
		Assert(baserel->baserestrictcost.startup >= disable_cost);
		startup_cost -= disable_cost;
	}
	else if (!enable_tidscan)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * The TID qual expressions will be computed once, any other baserestrict
	 * quals once per retrieved tuple.
	 */
	cost_qual_eval(&tid_qual_cost, tidquals, root);

	/* disk costs --- assume each tuple on a different page */
	run_cost += random_page_cost * ntuples;

	/* CPU costs */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup +
		tid_qual_cost.per_tuple;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple -
		tid_qual_cost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * ntuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_subqueryscan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a subquery RTE.
 */
void
cost_subqueryscan(Path *path, RelOptInfo *baserel)
{
	Cost		startup_cost;
	Cost		run_cost;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are subqueries */
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY);

	/*
	 * Cost of path is cost of evaluating the subplan, plus cost of evaluating
	 * any restriction clauses that will be attached to the SubqueryScan node,
	 * plus cpu_tuple_cost to account for selection and projection overhead.
	 */
	path->startup_cost = baserel->subplan->startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = baserel->subplan->total_cost;

	startup_cost = baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;
	run_cost = cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples;

	path->startup_cost += startup_cost;
	path->total_cost += startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_functionscan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a function RTE.
 */
void
cost_functionscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	RangeTblEntry *rte;
	QualCost	exprcost;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are functions */
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	rte = planner_rt_fetch(baserel->relid, root);
	Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_FUNCTION);

	/* Estimate costs of executing the function expression */
	cost_qual_eval_node(&exprcost, rte->funcexpr, root);

	startup_cost += exprcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = exprcost.per_tuple;

	/* Add scanning CPU costs */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple += cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_valuesscan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a VALUES RTE.
 */
void
cost_valuesscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are values lists */
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_VALUES);

	/*
	 * For now, estimate list evaluation cost at one operator eval per list
	 * (probably pretty bogus, but is it worth being smarter?)
	 */
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_operator_cost;

	/* Add scanning CPU costs */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple += cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_ctescan
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of scanning a CTE RTE.
 *
 * Note: this is used for both self-reference and regular CTEs; the
 * possible cost differences are below the threshold of what we could
 * estimate accurately anyway.  Note that the costs of evaluating the
 * referenced CTE query are added into the final plan as initplan costs,
 * and should NOT be counted here.
 */
void
cost_ctescan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are CTEs */
	Assert(baserel->relid > 0);
	Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_CTE);

	/* Charge one CPU tuple cost per row for tuplestore manipulation */
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost;

	/* Add scanning CPU costs */
	startup_cost += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple += cpu_tuple_cost + baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_recursive_union
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of performing a recursive union,
 *	  and also the estimated output size.
 *
 * We are given Plans for the nonrecursive and recursive terms.
 *
 * Note that the arguments and output are Plans, not Paths as in most of
 * the rest of this module.  That's because we don't bother setting up a
 * Path representation for recursive union --- we have only one way to do it.
 */
void
cost_recursive_union(Plan *runion, Plan *nrterm, Plan *rterm)
{
	Cost		startup_cost;
	Cost		total_cost;
	double		total_rows;

	/* We probably have decent estimates for the non-recursive term */
	startup_cost = nrterm->startup_cost;
	total_cost = nrterm->total_cost;
	total_rows = nrterm->plan_rows;

	/*
	 * We arbitrarily assume that about 10 recursive iterations will be
	 * needed, and that we've managed to get a good fix on the cost and output
	 * size of each one of them.  These are mighty shaky assumptions but it's
	 * hard to see how to do better.
	 */
	total_cost += 10 * rterm->total_cost;
	total_rows += 10 * rterm->plan_rows;

	/*
	 * Also charge cpu_tuple_cost per row to account for the costs of
	 * manipulating the tuplestores.  (We don't worry about possible
	 * spill-to-disk costs.)
	 */
	total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * total_rows;

	runion->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	runion->total_cost = total_cost;
	runion->plan_rows = total_rows;
	runion->plan_width = Max(nrterm->plan_width, rterm->plan_width);
}

/*
 * cost_sort
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of sorting a relation, including
 *	  the cost of reading the input data.
 *
 * If the total volume of data to sort is less than work_mem, we will do
 * an in-memory sort, which requires no I/O and about t*log2(t) tuple
 * comparisons for t tuples.
 *
 * If the total volume exceeds work_mem, we switch to a tape-style merge
 * algorithm.  There will still be about t*log2(t) tuple comparisons in
 * total, but we will also need to write and read each tuple once per
 * merge pass.  We expect about ceil(logM(r)) merge passes where r is the
 * number of initial runs formed and M is the merge order used by tuplesort.c.
 * Since the average initial run should be about twice work_mem, we have
 *		disk traffic = 2 * relsize * ceil(logM(p / (2*work_mem)))
 *		cpu = comparison_cost * t * log2(t)
 *
 * If the sort is bounded (i.e., only the first k result tuples are needed)
 * and k tuples can fit into work_mem, we use a heap method that keeps only
 * k tuples in the heap; this will require about t*log2(k) tuple comparisons.
 *
 * The disk traffic is assumed to be 3/4ths sequential and 1/4th random
 * accesses (XXX can't we refine that guess?)
 *
 * We charge two operator evals per tuple comparison, which should be in
 * the right ballpark in most cases.
 *
 * 'pathkeys' is a list of sort keys
 * 'input_cost' is the total cost for reading the input data
 * 'tuples' is the number of tuples in the relation
 * 'width' is the average tuple width in bytes
 * 'limit_tuples' is the bound on the number of output tuples; -1 if no bound
 *
 * NOTE: some callers currently pass NIL for pathkeys because they
 * can't conveniently supply the sort keys.  Since this routine doesn't
 * currently do anything with pathkeys anyway, that doesn't matter...
 * but if it ever does, it should react gracefully to lack of key data.
 * (Actually, the thing we'd most likely be interested in is just the number
 * of sort keys, which all callers *could* supply.)
 */
void
cost_sort(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
		  List *pathkeys, Cost input_cost, double tuples, int width,
		  double limit_tuples)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = input_cost;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	double		input_bytes = relation_byte_size(tuples, width);
	double		output_bytes;
	double		output_tuples;
	long		work_mem_bytes = work_mem * 1024L;

	if (!enable_sort)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * We want to be sure the cost of a sort is never estimated as zero, even
	 * if passed-in tuple count is zero.  Besides, mustn't do log(0)...
	 */
	if (tuples < 2.0)
		tuples = 2.0;

	/* Do we have a useful LIMIT? */
	if (limit_tuples > 0 && limit_tuples < tuples)
	{
		output_tuples = limit_tuples;
		output_bytes = relation_byte_size(output_tuples, width);
	}
	else
	{
		output_tuples = tuples;
		output_bytes = input_bytes;
	}

	if (output_bytes > work_mem_bytes)
	{
		/*
		 * We'll have to use a disk-based sort of all the tuples
		 */
		double		npages = ceil(input_bytes / BLCKSZ);
		double		nruns = (input_bytes / work_mem_bytes) * 0.5;
		double		mergeorder = tuplesort_merge_order(work_mem_bytes);
		double		log_runs;
		double		npageaccesses;

		/*
		 * CPU costs
		 *
		 * Assume about two operator evals per tuple comparison and N log2 N
		 * comparisons
		 */
		startup_cost += 2.0 * cpu_operator_cost * tuples * LOG2(tuples);

		/* Disk costs */

		/* Compute logM(r) as log(r) / log(M) */
		if (nruns > mergeorder)
			log_runs = ceil(log(nruns) / log(mergeorder));
		else
			log_runs = 1.0;
		npageaccesses = 2.0 * npages * log_runs;
		/* Assume 3/4ths of accesses are sequential, 1/4th are not */
		startup_cost += npageaccesses *
			(seq_page_cost * 0.75 + random_page_cost * 0.25);
	}
	else if (tuples > 2 * output_tuples || input_bytes > work_mem_bytes)
	{
		/*
		 * We'll use a bounded heap-sort keeping just K tuples in memory, for
		 * a total number of tuple comparisons of N log2 K; but the constant
		 * factor is a bit higher than for quicksort.  Tweak it so that the
		 * cost curve is continuous at the crossover point.
		 */
		startup_cost += 2.0 * cpu_operator_cost * tuples * LOG2(2.0 * output_tuples);
	}
	else
	{
		/* We'll use plain quicksort on all the input tuples */
		startup_cost += 2.0 * cpu_operator_cost * tuples * LOG2(tuples);
	}

	/*
	 * Also charge a small amount (arbitrarily set equal to operator cost) per
	 * extracted tuple.  Note it's correct to use tuples not output_tuples
	 * here --- the upper LIMIT will pro-rate the run cost so we'd be double
	 * counting the LIMIT otherwise.
	 */
	run_cost += cpu_operator_cost * tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * sort_exceeds_work_mem
 *	  Given a finished Sort plan node, detect whether it is expected to
 *	  spill to disk (ie, will need more than work_mem workspace)
 *
 * This assumes there will be no available LIMIT.
 */
bool
sort_exceeds_work_mem(Sort *sort)
{
	double		input_bytes = relation_byte_size(sort->plan.plan_rows,
												 sort->plan.plan_width);
	long		work_mem_bytes = work_mem * 1024L;

	return (input_bytes > work_mem_bytes);
}

/*
 * cost_material
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of materializing a relation, including
 *	  the cost of reading the input data.
 *
 * If the total volume of data to materialize exceeds work_mem, we will need
 * to write it to disk, so the cost is much higher in that case.
 */
void
cost_material(Path *path,
			  Cost input_cost, double tuples, int width)
{
	Cost		startup_cost = input_cost;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	double		nbytes = relation_byte_size(tuples, width);
	long		work_mem_bytes = work_mem * 1024L;

	/* disk costs */
	if (nbytes > work_mem_bytes)
	{
		double		npages = ceil(nbytes / BLCKSZ);

		/* We'll write during startup and read during retrieval */
		startup_cost += seq_page_cost * npages;
		run_cost += seq_page_cost * npages;
	}

	/*
	 * Charge a very small amount per inserted tuple, to reflect bookkeeping
	 * costs.  We use cpu_tuple_cost/10 for this.  This is needed to break the
	 * tie that would otherwise exist between nestloop with A outer,
	 * materialized B inner and nestloop with B outer, materialized A inner.
	 * The extra cost ensures we'll prefer materializing the smaller rel.
	 */
	startup_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * 0.1 * tuples;

	/*
	 * Also charge a small amount per extracted tuple.  We use cpu_tuple_cost
	 * so that it doesn't appear worthwhile to materialize a bare seqscan.
	 */
	run_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_agg
 *		Determines and returns the cost of performing an Agg plan node,
 *		including the cost of its input.
 *
 * Note: when aggstrategy == AGG_SORTED, caller must ensure that input costs
 * are for appropriately-sorted input.
 */
void
cost_agg(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
		 AggStrategy aggstrategy, int numAggs,
		 int numGroupCols, double numGroups,
		 Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost,
		 double input_tuples)
{
	Cost		startup_cost;
	Cost		total_cost;

	/*
	 * We charge one cpu_operator_cost per aggregate function per input tuple,
	 * and another one per output tuple (corresponding to transfn and finalfn
	 * calls respectively).  If we are grouping, we charge an additional
	 * cpu_operator_cost per grouping column per input tuple for grouping
	 * comparisons.
	 *
	 * We will produce a single output tuple if not grouping, and a tuple per
	 * group otherwise.  We charge cpu_tuple_cost for each output tuple.
	 *
	 * Note: in this cost model, AGG_SORTED and AGG_HASHED have exactly the
	 * same total CPU cost, but AGG_SORTED has lower startup cost.  If the
	 * input path is already sorted appropriately, AGG_SORTED should be
	 * preferred (since it has no risk of memory overflow).  This will happen
	 * as long as the computed total costs are indeed exactly equal --- but if
	 * there's roundoff error we might do the wrong thing.  So be sure that
	 * the computations below form the same intermediate values in the same
	 * order.
	 *
	 * Note: ideally we should use the pg_proc.procost costs of each
	 * aggregate's component functions, but for now that seems like an
	 * excessive amount of work.
	 */
	if (aggstrategy == AGG_PLAIN)
	{
		startup_cost = input_total_cost;
		startup_cost += cpu_operator_cost * (input_tuples + 1) * numAggs;
		/* we aren't grouping */
		total_cost = startup_cost + cpu_tuple_cost;
	}
	else if (aggstrategy == AGG_SORTED)
	{
		/* Here we are able to deliver output on-the-fly */
		startup_cost = input_startup_cost;
		total_cost = input_total_cost;
		/* calcs phrased this way to match HASHED case, see note above */
		total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numGroupCols;
		total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numAggs;
		total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * numGroups * numAggs;
		total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * numGroups;
	}
	else
	{
		/* must be AGG_HASHED */
		startup_cost = input_total_cost;
		startup_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numGroupCols;
		startup_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numAggs;
		total_cost = startup_cost;
		total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * numGroups * numAggs;
		total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * numGroups;
	}

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = total_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_windowagg
 *		Determines and returns the cost of performing a WindowAgg plan node,
 *		including the cost of its input.
 *
 * Input is assumed already properly sorted.
 */
void
cost_windowagg(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
			   int numWindowFuncs, int numPartCols, int numOrderCols,
			   Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost,
			   double input_tuples)
{
	Cost		startup_cost;
	Cost		total_cost;

	startup_cost = input_startup_cost;
	total_cost = input_total_cost;

	/*
	 * We charge one cpu_operator_cost per window function per tuple (often a
	 * drastic underestimate, but without a way to gauge how many tuples the
	 * window function will fetch, it's hard to do better).  We also charge
	 * cpu_operator_cost per grouping column per tuple for grouping
	 * comparisons, plus cpu_tuple_cost per tuple for general overhead.
	 */
	total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numWindowFuncs;
	total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * (numPartCols + numOrderCols);
	total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * input_tuples;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = total_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_group
 *		Determines and returns the cost of performing a Group plan node,
 *		including the cost of its input.
 *
 * Note: caller must ensure that input costs are for appropriately-sorted
 * input.
 */
void
cost_group(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root,
		   int numGroupCols, double numGroups,
		   Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost,
		   double input_tuples)
{
	Cost		startup_cost;
	Cost		total_cost;

	startup_cost = input_startup_cost;
	total_cost = input_total_cost;

	/*
	 * Charge one cpu_operator_cost per comparison per input tuple. We assume
	 * all columns get compared at most of the tuples.
	 */
	total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numGroupCols;

	path->startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->total_cost = total_cost;
}

/*
 * If a nestloop's inner path is an indexscan, be sure to use its estimated
 * output row count, which may be lower than the restriction-clause-only row
 * count of its parent.  (We don't include this case in the PATH_ROWS macro
 * because it applies *only* to a nestloop's inner relation.)  We have to
 * be prepared to recurse through Append nodes in case of an appendrel.
 */
static double
nestloop_inner_path_rows(Path *path)
{
	double		result;

	if (IsA(path, IndexPath))
		result = ((IndexPath *) path)->rows;
	else if (IsA(path, BitmapHeapPath))
		result = ((BitmapHeapPath *) path)->rows;
	else if (IsA(path, AppendPath))
	{
		ListCell   *l;

		result = 0;
		foreach(l, ((AppendPath *) path)->subpaths)
		{
			result += nestloop_inner_path_rows((Path *) lfirst(l));
		}
	}
	else
		result = PATH_ROWS(path);

	return result;
}

/*
 * cost_nestloop
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of joining two relations using the
 *	  nested loop algorithm.
 *
 * 'path' is already filled in except for the cost fields
 * 'sjinfo' is extra info about the join for selectivity estimation
 */
void
cost_nestloop(NestPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo)
{
	Path	   *outer_path = path->outerjoinpath;
	Path	   *inner_path = path->innerjoinpath;
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		inner_run_cost;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	QualCost	restrict_qual_cost;
	double		outer_path_rows = PATH_ROWS(outer_path);
	double		inner_path_rows = nestloop_inner_path_rows(inner_path);
	double		ntuples;
	Selectivity outer_match_frac;
	Selectivity match_count;
	bool		indexed_join_quals;

	if (!enable_nestloop)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/* cost of source data */

	/*
	 * NOTE: clearly, we must pay both outer and inner paths' startup_cost
	 * before we can start returning tuples, so the join's startup cost is
	 * their sum.  What's not so clear is whether the inner path's
	 * startup_cost must be paid again on each rescan of the inner path. This
	 * is not true if the inner path is materialized or is a hashjoin, but
	 * probably is true otherwise.
	 */
	startup_cost += outer_path->startup_cost + inner_path->startup_cost;
	run_cost += outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost;
	if (IsA(inner_path, MaterialPath) ||
		IsA(inner_path, HashPath))
	{
		/* charge only run cost for each iteration of inner path */
	}
	else
	{
		/*
		 * charge startup cost for each iteration of inner path, except we
		 * already charged the first startup_cost in our own startup
		 */
		run_cost += (outer_path_rows - 1) * inner_path->startup_cost;
	}
	inner_run_cost = inner_path->total_cost - inner_path->startup_cost;

	if (adjust_semi_join(root, path, sjinfo,
						 &outer_match_frac,
						 &match_count,
						 &indexed_join_quals))
	{
		double		outer_matched_rows;
		Selectivity inner_scan_frac;

		/*
		 * SEMI or ANTI join: executor will stop after first match.
		 *
		 * For an outer-rel row that has at least one match, we can expect the
		 * inner scan to stop after a fraction 1/(match_count+1) of the inner
		 * rows, if the matches are evenly distributed.  Since they probably
		 * aren't quite evenly distributed, we apply a fuzz factor of 2.0 to
		 * that fraction.  (If we used a larger fuzz factor, we'd have to
		 * clamp inner_scan_frac to at most 1.0; but since match_count is at
		 * least 1, no such clamp is needed now.)
		 */
		outer_matched_rows = rint(outer_path_rows * outer_match_frac);
		inner_scan_frac = 2.0 / (match_count + 1.0);

		/* Add inner run cost for outer tuples having matches */
		run_cost += outer_matched_rows * inner_run_cost * inner_scan_frac;

		/* Compute number of tuples processed (not number emitted!) */
		ntuples = outer_matched_rows * inner_path_rows * inner_scan_frac;

		/*
		 * For unmatched outer-rel rows, there are two cases.  If the inner
		 * path is an indexscan using all the joinquals as indexquals, then an
		 * unmatched row results in an indexscan returning no rows, which is
		 * probably quite cheap.  We estimate this case as the same cost to
		 * return the first tuple of a nonempty scan.  Otherwise, the executor
		 * will have to scan the whole inner rel; not so cheap.
		 */
		if (indexed_join_quals)
		{
			run_cost += (outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows) *
				inner_run_cost / inner_path_rows;
			/* We won't be evaluating any quals at all for these rows */
		}
		else
		{
			run_cost += (outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows) *
				inner_run_cost;
			ntuples += (outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows) *
				inner_path_rows;
		}
	}
	else
	{
		/* Normal case; we'll scan whole input rel for each outer row */
		run_cost += outer_path_rows * inner_run_cost;

		/* Compute number of tuples processed (not number emitted!) */
		ntuples = outer_path_rows * inner_path_rows;
	}

	/* CPU costs */
	cost_qual_eval(&restrict_qual_cost, path->joinrestrictinfo, root);
	startup_cost += restrict_qual_cost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + restrict_qual_cost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * ntuples;

	path->path.startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * cost_mergejoin
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of joining two relations using the
 *	  merge join algorithm.
 *
 * 'path' is already filled in except for the cost fields
 * 'sjinfo' is extra info about the join for selectivity estimation
 *
 * Notes: path's mergeclauses should be a subset of the joinrestrictinfo list;
 * outersortkeys and innersortkeys are lists of the keys to be used
 * to sort the outer and inner relations, or NIL if no explicit
 * sort is needed because the source path is already ordered.
 */
void
cost_mergejoin(MergePath *path, PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo)
{
	Path	   *outer_path = path->jpath.outerjoinpath;
	Path	   *inner_path = path->jpath.innerjoinpath;
	List	   *mergeclauses = path->path_mergeclauses;
	List	   *outersortkeys = path->outersortkeys;
	List	   *innersortkeys = path->innersortkeys;
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	QualCost	merge_qual_cost;
	QualCost	qp_qual_cost;
	double		outer_path_rows = PATH_ROWS(outer_path);
	double		inner_path_rows = PATH_ROWS(inner_path);
	double		outer_rows,
				inner_rows,
				outer_skip_rows,
				inner_skip_rows;
	double		mergejointuples,
				rescannedtuples;
	double		rescanratio;
	Selectivity outerstartsel,
				outerendsel,
				innerstartsel,
				innerendsel;
	Path		sort_path;		/* dummy for result of cost_sort */

	/* Protect some assumptions below that rowcounts aren't zero */
	if (outer_path_rows <= 0)
		outer_path_rows = 1;
	if (inner_path_rows <= 0)
		inner_path_rows = 1;

	if (!enable_mergejoin)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * Compute cost of the mergequals and qpquals (other restriction clauses)
	 * separately.
	 */
	cost_qual_eval(&merge_qual_cost, mergeclauses, root);
	cost_qual_eval(&qp_qual_cost, path->jpath.joinrestrictinfo, root);
	qp_qual_cost.startup -= merge_qual_cost.startup;
	qp_qual_cost.per_tuple -= merge_qual_cost.per_tuple;

	/*
	 * Get approx # tuples passing the mergequals.  We use approx_tuple_count
	 * here because we need an estimate done with JOIN_INNER semantics.
	 */
	mergejointuples = approx_tuple_count(root, &path->jpath, mergeclauses);

	/*
	 * When there are equal merge keys in the outer relation, the mergejoin
	 * must rescan any matching tuples in the inner relation. This means
	 * re-fetching inner tuples.  Our cost model for this is that a re-fetch
	 * costs the same as an original fetch, which is probably an overestimate;
	 * but on the other hand we ignore the bookkeeping costs of mark/restore.
	 * Not clear if it's worth developing a more refined model.
	 *
	 * For regular inner and outer joins, the number of re-fetches can be
	 * estimated approximately as size of merge join output minus size of
	 * inner relation. Assume that the distinct key values are 1, 2, ..., and
	 * denote the number of values of each key in the outer relation as m1,
	 * m2, ...; in the inner relation, n1, n2, ...  Then we have
	 *
	 * size of join = m1 * n1 + m2 * n2 + ...
	 *
	 * number of rescanned tuples = (m1 - 1) * n1 + (m2 - 1) * n2 + ... = m1 *
	 * n1 + m2 * n2 + ... - (n1 + n2 + ...) = size of join - size of inner
	 * relation
	 *
	 * This equation works correctly for outer tuples having no inner match
	 * (nk = 0), but not for inner tuples having no outer match (mk = 0); we
	 * are effectively subtracting those from the number of rescanned tuples,
	 * when we should not.  Can we do better without expensive selectivity
	 * computations?
	 *
	 * The whole issue is moot if we are working from a unique-ified outer
	 * input.
	 */
	if (IsA(outer_path, UniquePath))
		rescannedtuples = 0;
	else
	{
		rescannedtuples = mergejointuples - inner_path_rows;
		/* Must clamp because of possible underestimate */
		if (rescannedtuples < 0)
			rescannedtuples = 0;
	}
	/* We'll inflate inner run cost this much to account for rescanning */
	rescanratio = 1.0 + (rescannedtuples / inner_path_rows);

	/*
	 * A merge join will stop as soon as it exhausts either input stream
	 * (unless it's an outer join, in which case the outer side has to be
	 * scanned all the way anyway).  Estimate fraction of the left and right
	 * inputs that will actually need to be scanned.  Likewise, we can
	 * estimate the number of rows that will be skipped before the first join
	 * pair is found, which should be factored into startup cost. We use only
	 * the first (most significant) merge clause for this purpose. Since
	 * mergejoinscansel() is a fairly expensive computation, we cache the
	 * results in the merge clause RestrictInfo.
	 */
	if (mergeclauses && path->jpath.jointype != JOIN_FULL)
	{
		RestrictInfo *firstclause = (RestrictInfo *) linitial(mergeclauses);
		List	   *opathkeys;
		List	   *ipathkeys;
		PathKey    *opathkey;
		PathKey    *ipathkey;
		MergeScanSelCache *cache;

		/* Get the input pathkeys to determine the sort-order details */
		opathkeys = outersortkeys ? outersortkeys : outer_path->pathkeys;
		ipathkeys = innersortkeys ? innersortkeys : inner_path->pathkeys;
		Assert(opathkeys);
		Assert(ipathkeys);
		opathkey = (PathKey *) linitial(opathkeys);
		ipathkey = (PathKey *) linitial(ipathkeys);
		/* debugging check */
		if (opathkey->pk_opfamily != ipathkey->pk_opfamily ||
			opathkey->pk_strategy != ipathkey->pk_strategy ||
			opathkey->pk_nulls_first != ipathkey->pk_nulls_first)
			elog(ERROR, "left and right pathkeys do not match in mergejoin");

		/* Get the selectivity with caching */
		cache = cached_scansel(root, firstclause, opathkey);

		if (bms_is_subset(firstclause->left_relids,
						  outer_path->parent->relids))
		{
			/* left side of clause is outer */
			outerstartsel = cache->leftstartsel;
			outerendsel = cache->leftendsel;
			innerstartsel = cache->rightstartsel;
			innerendsel = cache->rightendsel;
		}
		else
		{
			/* left side of clause is inner */
			outerstartsel = cache->rightstartsel;
			outerendsel = cache->rightendsel;
			innerstartsel = cache->leftstartsel;
			innerendsel = cache->leftendsel;
		}
		if (path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_LEFT ||
			path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_ANTI)
		{
			outerstartsel = 0.0;
			outerendsel = 1.0;
		}
		else if (path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_RIGHT)
		{
			innerstartsel = 0.0;
			innerendsel = 1.0;
		}
	}
	else
	{
		/* cope with clauseless or full mergejoin */
		outerstartsel = innerstartsel = 0.0;
		outerendsel = innerendsel = 1.0;
	}

	/*
	 * Convert selectivities to row counts.  We force outer_rows and
	 * inner_rows to be at least 1, but the skip_rows estimates can be zero.
	 */
	outer_skip_rows = rint(outer_path_rows * outerstartsel);
	inner_skip_rows = rint(inner_path_rows * innerstartsel);
	outer_rows = clamp_row_est(outer_path_rows * outerendsel);
	inner_rows = clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innerendsel);

	Assert(outer_skip_rows <= outer_rows);
	Assert(inner_skip_rows <= inner_rows);

	/*
	 * Readjust scan selectivities to account for above rounding.  This is
	 * normally an insignificant effect, but when there are only a few rows in
	 * the inputs, failing to do this makes for a large percentage error.
	 */
	outerstartsel = outer_skip_rows / outer_path_rows;
	innerstartsel = inner_skip_rows / inner_path_rows;
	outerendsel = outer_rows / outer_path_rows;
	innerendsel = inner_rows / inner_path_rows;

	Assert(outerstartsel <= outerendsel);
	Assert(innerstartsel <= innerendsel);

	/* cost of source data */

	if (outersortkeys)			/* do we need to sort outer? */
	{
		cost_sort(&sort_path,
				  root,
				  outersortkeys,
				  outer_path->total_cost,
				  outer_path_rows,
				  outer_path->parent->width,
				  -1.0);
		startup_cost += sort_path.startup_cost;
		startup_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost)
			* outerstartsel;
		run_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost)
			* (outerendsel - outerstartsel);
	}
	else
	{
		startup_cost += outer_path->startup_cost;
		startup_cost += (outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost)
			* outerstartsel;
		run_cost += (outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost)
			* (outerendsel - outerstartsel);
	}

	if (innersortkeys)			/* do we need to sort inner? */
	{
		cost_sort(&sort_path,
				  root,
				  innersortkeys,
				  inner_path->total_cost,
				  inner_path_rows,
				  inner_path->parent->width,
				  -1.0);
		startup_cost += sort_path.startup_cost;
		startup_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost)
			* innerstartsel * rescanratio;
		run_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost)
			* (innerendsel - innerstartsel) * rescanratio;

		/*
		 * If the inner sort is expected to spill to disk, we want to add a
		 * materialize node to shield it from the need to handle mark/restore.
		 * This will allow it to perform the last merge pass on-the-fly, while
		 * in most cases not requiring the materialize to spill to disk.
		 * Charge an extra cpu_tuple_cost per tuple to account for the
		 * materialize node.  (Keep this estimate in sync with similar ones in
		 * create_mergejoin_path and create_mergejoin_plan.)
		 */
		if (relation_byte_size(inner_path_rows, inner_path->parent->width) >
			(work_mem * 1024L))
			run_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * inner_path_rows;
	}
	else
	{
		startup_cost += inner_path->startup_cost;
		startup_cost += (inner_path->total_cost - inner_path->startup_cost)
			* innerstartsel * rescanratio;
		run_cost += (inner_path->total_cost - inner_path->startup_cost)
			* (innerendsel - innerstartsel) * rescanratio;
	}

	/* CPU costs */

	/*
	 * The number of tuple comparisons needed is approximately number of outer
	 * rows plus number of inner rows plus number of rescanned tuples (can we
	 * refine this?).  At each one, we need to evaluate the mergejoin quals.
	 */
	startup_cost += merge_qual_cost.startup;
	startup_cost += merge_qual_cost.per_tuple *
		(outer_skip_rows + inner_skip_rows * rescanratio);
	run_cost += merge_qual_cost.per_tuple *
		((outer_rows - outer_skip_rows) +
		 (inner_rows - inner_skip_rows) * rescanratio);

	/*
	 * For each tuple that gets through the mergejoin proper, we charge
	 * cpu_tuple_cost plus the cost of evaluating additional restriction
	 * clauses that are to be applied at the join.  (This is pessimistic since
	 * not all of the quals may get evaluated at each tuple.)
	 *
	 * Note: we could adjust for SEMI/ANTI joins skipping some qual
	 * evaluations here, but it's probably not worth the trouble.
	 */
	startup_cost += qp_qual_cost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qp_qual_cost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * mergejointuples;

	path->jpath.path.startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->jpath.path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}

/*
 * run mergejoinscansel() with caching
 */
static MergeScanSelCache *
cached_scansel(PlannerInfo *root, RestrictInfo *rinfo, PathKey *pathkey)
{
	MergeScanSelCache *cache;
	ListCell   *lc;
	Selectivity leftstartsel,
				leftendsel,
				rightstartsel,
				rightendsel;
	MemoryContext oldcontext;

	/* Do we have this result already? */
	foreach(lc, rinfo->scansel_cache)
	{
		cache = (MergeScanSelCache *) lfirst(lc);
		if (cache->opfamily == pathkey->pk_opfamily &&
			cache->strategy == pathkey->pk_strategy &&
			cache->nulls_first == pathkey->pk_nulls_first)
			return cache;
	}

	/* Nope, do the computation */
	mergejoinscansel(root,
					 (Node *) rinfo->clause,
					 pathkey->pk_opfamily,
					 pathkey->pk_strategy,
					 pathkey->pk_nulls_first,
					 &leftstartsel,
					 &leftendsel,
					 &rightstartsel,
					 &rightendsel);

	/* Cache the result in suitably long-lived workspace */
	oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt);

	cache = (MergeScanSelCache *) palloc(sizeof(MergeScanSelCache));
	cache->opfamily = pathkey->pk_opfamily;
	cache->strategy = pathkey->pk_strategy;
	cache->nulls_first = pathkey->pk_nulls_first;
	cache->leftstartsel = leftstartsel;
	cache->leftendsel = leftendsel;
	cache->rightstartsel = rightstartsel;
	cache->rightendsel = rightendsel;

	rinfo->scansel_cache = lappend(rinfo->scansel_cache, cache);

	MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);

	return cache;
}

/*
 * cost_hashjoin
 *	  Determines and returns the cost of joining two relations using the
 *	  hash join algorithm.
 *
 * 'path' is already filled in except for the cost fields
 * 'sjinfo' is extra info about the join for selectivity estimation
 *
 * Note: path's hashclauses should be a subset of the joinrestrictinfo list
 */
void
cost_hashjoin(HashPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo)
{
	Path	   *outer_path = path->jpath.outerjoinpath;
	Path	   *inner_path = path->jpath.innerjoinpath;
	List	   *hashclauses = path->path_hashclauses;
	Cost		startup_cost = 0;
	Cost		run_cost = 0;
	Cost		cpu_per_tuple;
	QualCost	hash_qual_cost;
	QualCost	qp_qual_cost;
	double		hashjointuples;
	double		outer_path_rows = PATH_ROWS(outer_path);
	double		inner_path_rows = PATH_ROWS(inner_path);
	int			num_hashclauses = list_length(hashclauses);
	int			numbuckets;
	int			numbatches;
	int			num_skew_mcvs;
	double		virtualbuckets;
	Selectivity innerbucketsize;
	Selectivity outer_match_frac;
	Selectivity match_count;
	ListCell   *hcl;

	if (!enable_hashjoin)
		startup_cost += disable_cost;

	/*
	 * Compute cost of the hashquals and qpquals (other restriction clauses)
	 * separately.
	 */
	cost_qual_eval(&hash_qual_cost, hashclauses, root);
	cost_qual_eval(&qp_qual_cost, path->jpath.joinrestrictinfo, root);
	qp_qual_cost.startup -= hash_qual_cost.startup;
	qp_qual_cost.per_tuple -= hash_qual_cost.per_tuple;

	/* cost of source data */
	startup_cost += outer_path->startup_cost;
	run_cost += outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost;
	startup_cost += inner_path->total_cost;

	/*
	 * Cost of computing hash function: must do it once per input tuple. We
	 * charge one cpu_operator_cost for each column's hash function.  Also,
	 * tack on one cpu_tuple_cost per inner row, to model the costs of
	 * inserting the row into the hashtable.
	 *
	 * XXX when a hashclause is more complex than a single operator, we really
	 * should charge the extra eval costs of the left or right side, as
	 * appropriate, here.  This seems more work than it's worth at the moment.
	 */
	startup_cost += (cpu_operator_cost * num_hashclauses + cpu_tuple_cost)
		* inner_path_rows;
	run_cost += cpu_operator_cost * num_hashclauses * outer_path_rows;

	/*
	 * Get hash table size that executor would use for inner relation.
	 *
	 * XXX for the moment, always assume that skew optimization will be
	 * performed.  As long as SKEW_WORK_MEM_PERCENT is small, it's not worth
	 * trying to determine that for sure.
	 *
	 * XXX at some point it might be interesting to try to account for skew
	 * optimization in the cost estimate, but for now, we don't.
	 */
	ExecChooseHashTableSize(inner_path_rows,
							inner_path->parent->width,
							true,		/* useskew */
							&numbuckets,
							&numbatches,
							&num_skew_mcvs);
	virtualbuckets = (double) numbuckets *(double) numbatches;

	/* mark the path with estimated # of batches */
	path->num_batches = numbatches;

	/*
	 * Determine bucketsize fraction for inner relation.  We use the smallest
	 * bucketsize estimated for any individual hashclause; this is undoubtedly
	 * conservative.
	 *
	 * BUT: if inner relation has been unique-ified, we can assume it's good
	 * for hashing.  This is important both because it's the right answer, and
	 * because we avoid contaminating the cache with a value that's wrong for
	 * non-unique-ified paths.
	 */
	if (IsA(inner_path, UniquePath))
		innerbucketsize = 1.0 / virtualbuckets;
	else
	{
		innerbucketsize = 1.0;
		foreach(hcl, hashclauses)
		{
			RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(hcl);
			Selectivity thisbucketsize;

			Assert(IsA(restrictinfo, RestrictInfo));

			/*
			 * First we have to figure out which side of the hashjoin clause
			 * is the inner side.
			 *
			 * Since we tend to visit the same clauses over and over when
			 * planning a large query, we cache the bucketsize estimate in the
			 * RestrictInfo node to avoid repeated lookups of statistics.
			 */
			if (bms_is_subset(restrictinfo->right_relids,
							  inner_path->parent->relids))
			{
				/* righthand side is inner */
				thisbucketsize = restrictinfo->right_bucketsize;
				if (thisbucketsize < 0)
				{
					/* not cached yet */
					thisbucketsize =
						estimate_hash_bucketsize(root,
										   get_rightop(restrictinfo->clause),
												 virtualbuckets);
					restrictinfo->right_bucketsize = thisbucketsize;
				}
			}
			else
			{
				Assert(bms_is_subset(restrictinfo->left_relids,
									 inner_path->parent->relids));
				/* lefthand side is inner */
				thisbucketsize = restrictinfo->left_bucketsize;
				if (thisbucketsize < 0)
				{
					/* not cached yet */
					thisbucketsize =
						estimate_hash_bucketsize(root,
											get_leftop(restrictinfo->clause),
												 virtualbuckets);
					restrictinfo->left_bucketsize = thisbucketsize;
				}
			}

			if (innerbucketsize > thisbucketsize)
				innerbucketsize = thisbucketsize;
		}
	}

	/*
	 * If inner relation is too big then we will need to "batch" the join,
	 * which implies writing and reading most of the tuples to disk an extra
	 * time.  Charge seq_page_cost per page, since the I/O should be nice and
	 * sequential.  Writing the inner rel counts as startup cost, all the rest
	 * as run cost.
	 */
	if (numbatches > 1)
	{
		double		outerpages = page_size(outer_path_rows,
										   outer_path->parent->width);
		double		innerpages = page_size(inner_path_rows,
										   inner_path->parent->width);

		startup_cost += seq_page_cost * innerpages;
		run_cost += seq_page_cost * (innerpages + 2 * outerpages);
	}

	/* CPU costs */

	if (adjust_semi_join(root, &path->jpath, sjinfo,
						 &outer_match_frac,
						 &match_count,
						 NULL))
	{
		double		outer_matched_rows;
		Selectivity inner_scan_frac;

		/*
		 * SEMI or ANTI join: executor will stop after first match.
		 *
		 * For an outer-rel row that has at least one match, we can expect the
		 * bucket scan to stop after a fraction 1/(match_count+1) of the
		 * bucket's rows, if the matches are evenly distributed.  Since they
		 * probably aren't quite evenly distributed, we apply a fuzz factor of
		 * 2.0 to that fraction.  (If we used a larger fuzz factor, we'd have
		 * to clamp inner_scan_frac to at most 1.0; but since match_count is
		 * at least 1, no such clamp is needed now.)
		 */
		outer_matched_rows = rint(outer_path_rows * outer_match_frac);
		inner_scan_frac = 2.0 / (match_count + 1.0);

		startup_cost += hash_qual_cost.startup;
		run_cost += hash_qual_cost.per_tuple * outer_matched_rows *
			clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innerbucketsize * inner_scan_frac) * 0.5;

		/*
		 * For unmatched outer-rel rows, the picture is quite a lot different.
		 * In the first place, there is no reason to assume that these rows
		 * preferentially hit heavily-populated buckets; instead assume they
		 * are uncorrelated with the inner distribution and so they see an
		 * average bucket size of inner_path_rows / virtualbuckets.  In the
		 * second place, it seems likely that they will have few if any exact
		 * hash-code matches and so very few of the tuples in the bucket will
		 * actually require eval of the hash quals.  We don't have any good
		 * way to estimate how many will, but for the moment assume that the
		 * effective cost per bucket entry is one-tenth what it is for
		 * matchable tuples.
		 */
		run_cost += hash_qual_cost.per_tuple *
			(outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows) *
			clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows / virtualbuckets) * 0.05;

		/* Get # of tuples that will pass the basic join */
		if (path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_SEMI)
			hashjointuples = outer_matched_rows;
		else
			hashjointuples = outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows;
	}
	else
	{
		/*
		 * The number of tuple comparisons needed is the number of outer
		 * tuples times the typical number of tuples in a hash bucket, which
		 * is the inner relation size times its bucketsize fraction.  At each
		 * one, we need to evaluate the hashjoin quals.  But actually,
		 * charging the full qual eval cost at each tuple is pessimistic,
		 * since we don't evaluate the quals unless the hash values match
		 * exactly.  For lack of a better idea, halve the cost estimate to
		 * allow for that.
		 */
		startup_cost += hash_qual_cost.startup;
		run_cost += hash_qual_cost.per_tuple * outer_path_rows *
			clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innerbucketsize) * 0.5;

		/*
		 * Get approx # tuples passing the hashquals.  We use
		 * approx_tuple_count here because we need an estimate done with
		 * JOIN_INNER semantics.
		 */
		hashjointuples = approx_tuple_count(root, &path->jpath, hashclauses);
	}

	/*
	 * For each tuple that gets through the hashjoin proper, we charge
	 * cpu_tuple_cost plus the cost of evaluating additional restriction
	 * clauses that are to be applied at the join.  (This is pessimistic since
	 * not all of the quals may get evaluated at each tuple.)
	 */
	startup_cost += qp_qual_cost.startup;
	cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qp_qual_cost.per_tuple;
	run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * hashjointuples;

	path->jpath.path.startup_cost = startup_cost;
	path->jpath.path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost;
}


/*
 * cost_subplan
 *		Figure the costs for a SubPlan (or initplan).
 *
 * Note: we could dig the subplan's Plan out of the root list, but in practice
 * all callers have it handy already, so we make them pass it.
 */
void
cost_subplan(PlannerInfo *root, SubPlan *subplan, Plan *plan)
{
	QualCost	sp_cost;

	/* Figure any cost for evaluating the testexpr */
	cost_qual_eval(&sp_cost,
				   make_ands_implicit((Expr *) subplan->testexpr),
				   root);

	if (subplan->useHashTable)
	{
		/*
		 * If we are using a hash table for the subquery outputs, then the
		 * cost of evaluating the query is a one-time cost.  We charge one
		 * cpu_operator_cost per tuple for the work of loading the hashtable,
		 * too.
		 */
		sp_cost.startup += plan->total_cost +
			cpu_operator_cost * plan->plan_rows;

		/*
		 * The per-tuple costs include the cost of evaluating the lefthand
		 * expressions, plus the cost of probing the hashtable.  We already
		 * accounted for the lefthand expressions as part of the testexpr, and
		 * will also have counted one cpu_operator_cost for each comparison
		 * operator.  That is probably too low for the probing cost, but it's
		 * hard to make a better estimate, so live with it for now.
		 */
	}
	else
	{
		/*
		 * Otherwise we will be rescanning the subplan output on each
		 * evaluation.  We need to estimate how much of the output we will
		 * actually need to scan.  NOTE: this logic should agree with the
		 * tuple_fraction estimates used by make_subplan() in
		 * plan/subselect.c.
		 */
		Cost		plan_run_cost = plan->total_cost - plan->startup_cost;

		if (subplan->subLinkType == EXISTS_SUBLINK)
		{
			/* we only need to fetch 1 tuple */
			sp_cost.per_tuple += plan_run_cost / plan->plan_rows;
		}
		else if (subplan->subLinkType == ALL_SUBLINK ||
				 subplan->subLinkType == ANY_SUBLINK)
		{
			/* assume we need 50% of the tuples */
			sp_cost.per_tuple += 0.50 * plan_run_cost;
			/* also charge a cpu_operator_cost per row examined */
			sp_cost.per_tuple += 0.50 * plan->plan_rows * cpu_operator_cost;
		}
		else
		{
			/* assume we need all tuples */
			sp_cost.per_tuple += plan_run_cost;
		}

		/*
		 * Also account for subplan's startup cost. If the subplan is
		 * uncorrelated or undirect correlated, AND its topmost node is a Sort
		 * or Material node, assume that we'll only need to pay its startup
		 * cost once; otherwise assume we pay the startup cost every time.
		 */
		if (subplan->parParam == NIL &&
			(IsA(plan, Sort) ||
			 IsA(plan, Material)))
			sp_cost.startup += plan->startup_cost;
		else
			sp_cost.per_tuple += plan->startup_cost;
	}

	subplan->startup_cost = sp_cost.startup;
	subplan->per_call_cost = sp_cost.per_tuple;
}


/*
 * cost_qual_eval
 *		Estimate the CPU costs of evaluating a WHERE clause.
 *		The input can be either an implicitly-ANDed list of boolean
 *		expressions, or a list of RestrictInfo nodes.  (The latter is
 *		preferred since it allows caching of the results.)
 *		The result includes both a one-time (startup) component,
 *		and a per-evaluation component.
 */
void
cost_qual_eval(QualCost *cost, List *quals, PlannerInfo *root)
{
	cost_qual_eval_context context;
	ListCell   *l;

	context.root = root;
	context.total.startup = 0;
	context.total.per_tuple = 0;

	/* We don't charge any cost for the implicit ANDing at top level ... */

	foreach(l, quals)
	{
		Node	   *qual = (Node *) lfirst(l);

		cost_qual_eval_walker(qual, &context);
	}

	*cost = context.total;
}

/*
 * cost_qual_eval_node
 *		As above, for a single RestrictInfo or expression.
 */
void
cost_qual_eval_node(QualCost *cost, Node *qual, PlannerInfo *root)
{
	cost_qual_eval_context context;

	context.root = root;
	context.total.startup = 0;
	context.total.per_tuple = 0;

	cost_qual_eval_walker(qual, &context);

	*cost = context.total;
}

static bool
cost_qual_eval_walker(Node *node, cost_qual_eval_context *context)
{
	if (node == NULL)
		return false;

	/*
	 * RestrictInfo nodes contain an eval_cost field reserved for this
	 * routine's use, so that it's not necessary to evaluate the qual clause's
	 * cost more than once.  If the clause's cost hasn't been computed yet,
	 * the field's startup value will contain -1.
	 */
	if (IsA(node, RestrictInfo))
	{
		RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) node;

		if (rinfo->eval_cost.startup < 0)
		{
			cost_qual_eval_context locContext;

			locContext.root = context->root;
			locContext.total.startup = 0;
			locContext.total.per_tuple = 0;

			/*
			 * For an OR clause, recurse into the marked-up tree so that we
			 * set the eval_cost for contained RestrictInfos too.
			 */
			if (rinfo->orclause)
				cost_qual_eval_walker((Node *) rinfo->orclause, &locContext);
			else
				cost_qual_eval_walker((Node *) rinfo->clause, &locContext);

			/*
			 * If the RestrictInfo is marked pseudoconstant, it will be tested
			 * only once, so treat its cost as all startup cost.
			 */
			if (rinfo->pseudoconstant)
			{
				/* count one execution during startup */
				locContext.total.startup += locContext.total.per_tuple;
				locContext.total.per_tuple = 0;
			}
			rinfo->eval_cost = locContext.total;
		}
		context->total.startup += rinfo->eval_cost.startup;
		context->total.per_tuple += rinfo->eval_cost.per_tuple;
		/* do NOT recurse into children */
		return false;
	}

	/*
	 * For each operator or function node in the given tree, we charge the
	 * estimated execution cost given by pg_proc.procost (remember to multiply
	 * this by cpu_operator_cost).
	 *
	 * Vars and Consts are charged zero, and so are boolean operators (AND,
	 * OR, NOT). Simplistic, but a lot better than no model at all.
	 *
	 * Note that Aggref and WindowFunc nodes are (and should be) treated like
	 * Vars --- whatever execution cost they have is absorbed into
	 * plan-node-specific costing.  As far as expression evaluation is
	 * concerned they're just like Vars.
	 *
	 * Should we try to account for the possibility of short-circuit
	 * evaluation of AND/OR?  Probably *not*, because that would make the
	 * results depend on the clause ordering, and we are not in any position
	 * to expect that the current ordering of the clauses is the one that's
	 * going to end up being used.  (Is it worth applying order_qual_clauses
	 * much earlier in the planning process to fix this?)
	 */
	if (IsA(node, FuncExpr))
	{
		context->total.per_tuple +=
			get_func_cost(((FuncExpr *) node)->funcid) * cpu_operator_cost;
	}
	else if (IsA(node, OpExpr) ||
			 IsA(node, DistinctExpr) ||
			 IsA(node, NullIfExpr))
	{
		/* rely on struct equivalence to treat these all alike */
		set_opfuncid((OpExpr *) node);
		context->total.per_tuple +=
			get_func_cost(((OpExpr *) node)->opfuncid) * cpu_operator_cost;
	}
	else if (IsA(node, ScalarArrayOpExpr))
	{
		/*
		 * Estimate that the operator will be applied to about half of the
		 * array elements before the answer is determined.
		 */
		ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) node;
		Node	   *arraynode = (Node *) lsecond(saop->args);

		set_sa_opfuncid(saop);
		context->total.per_tuple += get_func_cost(saop->opfuncid) *
			cpu_operator_cost * estimate_array_length(arraynode) * 0.5;
	}
	else if (IsA(node, CoerceViaIO))
	{
		CoerceViaIO *iocoerce = (CoerceViaIO *) node;
		Oid			iofunc;
		Oid			typioparam;
		bool		typisvarlena;

		/* check the result type's input function */
		getTypeInputInfo(iocoerce->resulttype,
						 &iofunc, &typioparam);
		context->total.per_tuple += get_func_cost(iofunc) * cpu_operator_cost;
		/* check the input type's output function */
		getTypeOutputInfo(exprType((Node *) iocoerce->arg),
						  &iofunc, &typisvarlena);
		context->total.per_tuple += get_func_cost(iofunc) * cpu_operator_cost;
	}
	else if (IsA(node, ArrayCoerceExpr))
	{
		ArrayCoerceExpr *acoerce = (ArrayCoerceExpr *) node;
		Node	   *arraynode = (Node *) acoerce->arg;

		if (OidIsValid(acoerce->elemfuncid))
			context->total.per_tuple += get_func_cost(acoerce->elemfuncid) *
				cpu_operator_cost * estimate_array_length(arraynode);
	}
	else if (IsA(node, RowCompareExpr))
	{
		/* Conservatively assume we will check all the columns */
		RowCompareExpr *rcexpr = (RowCompareExpr *) node;
		ListCell   *lc;

		foreach(lc, rcexpr->opnos)
		{
			Oid			opid = lfirst_oid(lc);

			context->total.per_tuple += get_func_cost(get_opcode(opid)) *
				cpu_operator_cost;
		}
	}
	else if (IsA(node, CurrentOfExpr))
	{
		/* Report high cost to prevent selection of anything but TID scan */
		context->total.startup += disable_cost;
	}
	else if (IsA(node, SubLink))
	{
		/* This routine should not be applied to un-planned expressions */
		elog(ERROR, "cannot handle unplanned sub-select");
	}
	else if (IsA(node, SubPlan))
	{
		/*
		 * A subplan node in an expression typically indicates that the
		 * subplan will be executed on each evaluation, so charge accordingly.
		 * (Sub-selects that can be executed as InitPlans have already been
		 * removed from the expression.)
		 */
		SubPlan    *subplan = (SubPlan *) node;

		context->total.startup += subplan->startup_cost;
		context->total.per_tuple += subplan->per_call_cost;

		/*
		 * We don't want to recurse into the testexpr, because it was already
		 * counted in the SubPlan node's costs.  So we're done.
		 */
		return false;
	}
	else if (IsA(node, AlternativeSubPlan))
	{
		/*
		 * Arbitrarily use the first alternative plan for costing.  (We should
		 * certainly only include one alternative, and we don't yet have
		 * enough information to know which one the executor is most likely to
		 * use.)
		 */
		AlternativeSubPlan *asplan = (AlternativeSubPlan *) node;

		return cost_qual_eval_walker((Node *) linitial(asplan->subplans),
									 context);
	}

	/* recurse into children */
	return expression_tree_walker(node, cost_qual_eval_walker,
								  (void *) context);
}


/*
 * adjust_semi_join
 *	  Estimate how much of the inner input a SEMI or ANTI join
 *	  can be expected to scan.
 *
 * In a hash or nestloop SEMI/ANTI join, the executor will stop scanning
 * inner rows as soon as it finds a match to the current outer row.
 * We should therefore adjust some of the cost components for this effect.
 * This function computes some estimates needed for these adjustments.
 *
 * 'path' is already filled in except for the cost fields
 * 'sjinfo' is extra info about the join for selectivity estimation
 *
 * Returns TRUE if this is a SEMI or ANTI join, FALSE if not.
 *
 * Output parameters (set only in TRUE-result case):
 * *outer_match_frac is set to the fraction of the outer tuples that are
 *		expected to have at least one match.
 * *match_count is set to the average number of matches expected for
 *		outer tuples that have at least one match.
 * *indexed_join_quals is set to TRUE if all the joinquals are used as
 *		inner index quals, FALSE if not.
 *
 * indexed_join_quals can be passed as NULL if that information is not
 * relevant (it is only useful for the nestloop case).
 */
static bool
adjust_semi_join(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo,
				 Selectivity *outer_match_frac,
				 Selectivity *match_count,
				 bool *indexed_join_quals)
{
	JoinType	jointype = path->jointype;
	Selectivity jselec;
	Selectivity nselec;
	Selectivity avgmatch;
	SpecialJoinInfo norm_sjinfo;
	List	   *joinquals;
	ListCell   *l;

	/* Fall out if it's not JOIN_SEMI or JOIN_ANTI */
	if (jointype != JOIN_SEMI && jointype != JOIN_ANTI)
		return false;

	/*
	 * Note: it's annoying to repeat this selectivity estimation on each call,
	 * when the joinclause list will be the same for all path pairs
	 * implementing a given join.  clausesel.c will save us from the worst
	 * effects of this by caching at the RestrictInfo level; but perhaps it'd
	 * be worth finding a way to cache the results at a higher level.
	 */

	/*
	 * In an ANTI join, we must ignore clauses that are "pushed down", since
	 * those won't affect the match logic.  In a SEMI join, we do not
	 * distinguish joinquals from "pushed down" quals, so just use the whole
	 * restrictinfo list.
	 */
	if (jointype == JOIN_ANTI)
	{
		joinquals = NIL;
		foreach(l, path->joinrestrictinfo)
		{
			RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);

			Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
			if (!rinfo->is_pushed_down)
				joinquals = lappend(joinquals, rinfo);
		}
	}
	else
		joinquals = path->joinrestrictinfo;

	/*
	 * Get the JOIN_SEMI or JOIN_ANTI selectivity of the join clauses.
	 */
	jselec = clauselist_selectivity(root,
									joinquals,
									0,
									jointype,
									sjinfo);

	/*
	 * Also get the normal inner-join selectivity of the join clauses.
	 */
	norm_sjinfo.type = T_SpecialJoinInfo;
	norm_sjinfo.min_lefthand = path->outerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	norm_sjinfo.min_righthand = path->innerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	norm_sjinfo.syn_lefthand = path->outerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	norm_sjinfo.syn_righthand = path->innerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	norm_sjinfo.jointype = JOIN_INNER;
	/* we don't bother trying to make the remaining fields valid */
	norm_sjinfo.lhs_strict = false;
	norm_sjinfo.delay_upper_joins = false;
	norm_sjinfo.join_quals = NIL;

	nselec = clauselist_selectivity(root,
									joinquals,
									0,
									JOIN_INNER,
									&norm_sjinfo);

	/* Avoid leaking a lot of ListCells */
	if (jointype == JOIN_ANTI)
		list_free(joinquals);

	/*
	 * jselec can be interpreted as the fraction of outer-rel rows that have
	 * any matches (this is true for both SEMI and ANTI cases).  And nselec is
	 * the fraction of the Cartesian product that matches.  So, the average
	 * number of matches for each outer-rel row that has at least one match is
	 * nselec * inner_rows / jselec.
	 *
	 * Note: it is correct to use the inner rel's "rows" count here, not
	 * PATH_ROWS(), even if the inner path under consideration is an inner
	 * indexscan.  This is because we have included all the join clauses in
	 * the selectivity estimate, even ones used in an inner indexscan.
	 */
	if (jselec > 0)				/* protect against zero divide */
	{
		avgmatch = nselec * path->innerjoinpath->parent->rows / jselec;
		/* Clamp to sane range */
		avgmatch = Max(1.0, avgmatch);
	}
	else
		avgmatch = 1.0;

	*outer_match_frac = jselec;
	*match_count = avgmatch;

	/*
	 * If requested, check whether the inner path uses all the joinquals as
	 * indexquals.  (If that's true, we can assume that an unmatched outer
	 * tuple is cheap to process, whereas otherwise it's probably expensive.)
	 */
	if (indexed_join_quals)
	{
		if (path->joinrestrictinfo != NIL)
		{
			List	   *nrclauses;

			nrclauses = select_nonredundant_join_clauses(root,
														 path->joinrestrictinfo,
														 path->innerjoinpath);
			*indexed_join_quals = (nrclauses == NIL);
		}
		else
		{
			/* a clauseless join does NOT qualify */
			*indexed_join_quals = false;
		}
	}

	return true;
}


/*
 * approx_tuple_count
 *		Quick-and-dirty estimation of the number of join rows passing
 *		a set of qual conditions.
 *
 * The quals can be either an implicitly-ANDed list of boolean expressions,
 * or a list of RestrictInfo nodes (typically the latter).
 *
 * We intentionally compute the selectivity under JOIN_INNER rules, even
 * if it's some type of outer join.  This is appropriate because we are
 * trying to figure out how many tuples pass the initial merge or hash
 * join step.
 *
 * This is quick-and-dirty because we bypass clauselist_selectivity, and
 * simply multiply the independent clause selectivities together.  Now
 * clauselist_selectivity often can't do any better than that anyhow, but
 * for some situations (such as range constraints) it is smarter.  However,
 * we can't effectively cache the results of clauselist_selectivity, whereas
 * the individual clause selectivities can be and are cached.
 *
 * Since we are only using the results to estimate how many potential
 * output tuples are generated and passed through qpqual checking, it
 * seems OK to live with the approximation.
 */
static double
approx_tuple_count(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path, List *quals)
{
	double		tuples;
	double		outer_tuples = path->outerjoinpath->parent->rows;
	double		inner_tuples = path->innerjoinpath->parent->rows;
	SpecialJoinInfo sjinfo;
	Selectivity selec = 1.0;
	ListCell   *l;

	/*
	 * Make up a SpecialJoinInfo for JOIN_INNER semantics.
	 */
	sjinfo.type = T_SpecialJoinInfo;
	sjinfo.min_lefthand = path->outerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	sjinfo.min_righthand = path->innerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	sjinfo.syn_lefthand = path->outerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	sjinfo.syn_righthand = path->innerjoinpath->parent->relids;
	sjinfo.jointype = JOIN_INNER;
	/* we don't bother trying to make the remaining fields valid */
	sjinfo.lhs_strict = false;
	sjinfo.delay_upper_joins = false;
	sjinfo.join_quals = NIL;

	/* Get the approximate selectivity */
	foreach(l, quals)
	{
		Node	   *qual = (Node *) lfirst(l);

		/* Note that clause_selectivity will be able to cache its result */
		selec *= clause_selectivity(root, qual, 0, JOIN_INNER, &sjinfo);
	}

	/* Apply it to the input relation sizes */
	tuples = selec * outer_tuples * inner_tuples;

	return clamp_row_est(tuples);
}


/*
 * set_baserel_size_estimates
 *		Set the size estimates for the given base relation.
 *
 * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed
 * already.
 *
 * We set the following fields of the rel node:
 *	rows: the estimated number of output tuples (after applying
 *		  restriction clauses).
 *	width: the estimated average output tuple width in bytes.
 *	baserestrictcost: estimated cost of evaluating baserestrictinfo clauses.
 */
void
set_baserel_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
{
	double		nrows;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations */
	Assert(rel->relid > 0);

	nrows = rel->tuples *
		clauselist_selectivity(root,
							   rel->baserestrictinfo,
							   0,
							   JOIN_INNER,
							   NULL);

	rel->rows = clamp_row_est(nrows);

	cost_qual_eval(&rel->baserestrictcost, rel->baserestrictinfo, root);

	set_rel_width(root, rel);
}

/*
 * set_joinrel_size_estimates
 *		Set the size estimates for the given join relation.
 *
 * The rel's targetlist must have been constructed already, and a
 * restriction clause list that matches the given component rels must
 * be provided.
 *
 * Since there is more than one way to make a joinrel for more than two
 * base relations, the results we get here could depend on which component
 * rel pair is provided.  In theory we should get the same answers no matter
 * which pair is provided; in practice, since the selectivity estimation
 * routines don't handle all cases equally well, we might not.  But there's
 * not much to be done about it.  (Would it make sense to repeat the
 * calculations for each pair of input rels that's encountered, and somehow
 * average the results?  Probably way more trouble than it's worth.)
 *
 * We set only the rows field here.  The width field was already set by
 * build_joinrel_tlist, and baserestrictcost is not used for join rels.
 */
void
set_joinrel_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
						   RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
						   RelOptInfo *inner_rel,
						   SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo,
						   List *restrictlist)
{
	JoinType	jointype = sjinfo->jointype;
	Selectivity jselec;
	Selectivity pselec;
	double		nrows;

	/*
	 * Compute joinclause selectivity.  Note that we are only considering
	 * clauses that become restriction clauses at this join level; we are not
	 * double-counting them because they were not considered in estimating the
	 * sizes of the component rels.
	 *
	 * For an outer join, we have to distinguish the selectivity of the join's
	 * own clauses (JOIN/ON conditions) from any clauses that were "pushed
	 * down".  For inner joins we just count them all as joinclauses.
	 */
	if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(jointype))
	{
		List	   *joinquals = NIL;
		List	   *pushedquals = NIL;
		ListCell   *l;

		/* Grovel through the clauses to separate into two lists */
		foreach(l, restrictlist)
		{
			RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);

			Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
			if (rinfo->is_pushed_down)
				pushedquals = lappend(pushedquals, rinfo);
			else
				joinquals = lappend(joinquals, rinfo);
		}

		/* Get the separate selectivities */
		jselec = clauselist_selectivity(root,
										joinquals,
										0,
										jointype,
										sjinfo);
		pselec = clauselist_selectivity(root,
										pushedquals,
										0,
										jointype,
										sjinfo);

		/* Avoid leaking a lot of ListCells */
		list_free(joinquals);
		list_free(pushedquals);
	}
	else
	{
		jselec = clauselist_selectivity(root,
										restrictlist,
										0,
										jointype,
										sjinfo);
		pselec = 0.0;			/* not used, keep compiler quiet */
	}

	/*
	 * Basically, we multiply size of Cartesian product by selectivity.
	 *
	 * If we are doing an outer join, take that into account: the joinqual
	 * selectivity has to be clamped using the knowledge that the output must
	 * be at least as large as the non-nullable input.  However, any
	 * pushed-down quals are applied after the outer join, so their
	 * selectivity applies fully.
	 *
	 * For JOIN_SEMI and JOIN_ANTI, the selectivity is defined as the fraction
	 * of LHS rows that have matches, and we apply that straightforwardly.
	 */
	switch (jointype)
	{
		case JOIN_INNER:
			nrows = outer_rel->rows * inner_rel->rows * jselec;
			break;
		case JOIN_LEFT:
			nrows = outer_rel->rows * inner_rel->rows * jselec;
			if (nrows < outer_rel->rows)
				nrows = outer_rel->rows;
			nrows *= pselec;
			break;
		case JOIN_FULL:
			nrows = outer_rel->rows * inner_rel->rows * jselec;
			if (nrows < outer_rel->rows)
				nrows = outer_rel->rows;
			if (nrows < inner_rel->rows)
				nrows = inner_rel->rows;
			nrows *= pselec;
			break;
		case JOIN_SEMI:
			nrows = outer_rel->rows * jselec;
			/* pselec not used */
			break;
		case JOIN_ANTI:
			nrows = outer_rel->rows * (1.0 - jselec);
			nrows *= pselec;
			break;
		default:
			/* other values not expected here */
			elog(ERROR, "unrecognized join type: %d", (int) jointype);
			nrows = 0;			/* keep compiler quiet */
			break;
	}

	rel->rows = clamp_row_est(nrows);
}

/*
 * set_function_size_estimates
 *		Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a function call.
 *
 * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed
 * already.
 *
 * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates.
 */
void
set_function_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
{
	RangeTblEntry *rte;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are functions */
	Assert(rel->relid > 0);
	rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root);
	Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_FUNCTION);

	/* Estimate number of rows the function itself will return */
	rel->tuples = clamp_row_est(expression_returns_set_rows(rte->funcexpr));

	/* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */
	set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel);
}

/*
 * set_values_size_estimates
 *		Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a values list.
 *
 * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed
 * already.
 *
 * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates.
 */
void
set_values_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
{
	RangeTblEntry *rte;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are values lists */
	Assert(rel->relid > 0);
	rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root);
	Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_VALUES);

	/*
	 * Estimate number of rows the values list will return. We know this
	 * precisely based on the list length (well, barring set-returning
	 * functions in list items, but that's a refinement not catered for
	 * anywhere else either).
	 */
	rel->tuples = list_length(rte->values_lists);

	/* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */
	set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel);
}

/*
 * set_cte_size_estimates
 *		Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a CTE reference.
 *
 * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed
 * already, and we need the completed plan for the CTE (if a regular CTE)
 * or the non-recursive term (if a self-reference).
 *
 * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates.
 */
void
set_cte_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, Plan *cteplan)
{
	RangeTblEntry *rte;

	/* Should only be applied to base relations that are CTE references */
	Assert(rel->relid > 0);
	rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root);
	Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_CTE);

	if (rte->self_reference)
	{
		/*
		 * In a self-reference, arbitrarily assume the average worktable size
		 * is about 10 times the nonrecursive term's size.
		 */
		rel->tuples = 10 * cteplan->plan_rows;
	}
	else
	{
		/* Otherwise just believe the CTE plan's output estimate */
		rel->tuples = cteplan->plan_rows;
	}

	/* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */
	set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel);
}


/*
 * set_rel_width
 *		Set the estimated output width of a base relation.
 *
 * NB: this works best on plain relations because it prefers to look at
 * real Vars.  It will fail to make use of pg_statistic info when applied
 * to a subquery relation, even if the subquery outputs are simple vars
 * that we could have gotten info for.  Is it worth trying to be smarter
 * about subqueries?
 *
 * The per-attribute width estimates are cached for possible re-use while
 * building join relations.
 */
static void
set_rel_width(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel)
{
	Oid			reloid = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->relid;
	int32		tuple_width = 0;
	ListCell   *lc;

	foreach(lc, rel->reltargetlist)
	{
		Node	   *node = (Node *) lfirst(lc);

		if (IsA(node, Var))
		{
			Var		   *var = (Var *) node;
			int			ndx;
			int32		item_width;

			Assert(var->varno == rel->relid);
			Assert(var->varattno >= rel->min_attr);
			Assert(var->varattno <= rel->max_attr);

			ndx = var->varattno - rel->min_attr;

			/*
			 * The width probably hasn't been cached yet, but may as well
			 * check
			 */
			if (rel->attr_widths[ndx] > 0)
			{
				tuple_width += rel->attr_widths[ndx];
				continue;
			}

			/* Try to get column width from statistics */
			if (reloid != InvalidOid)
			{
				item_width = get_attavgwidth(reloid, var->varattno);
				if (item_width > 0)
				{
					rel->attr_widths[ndx] = item_width;
					tuple_width += item_width;
					continue;
				}
			}

			/*
			 * Not a plain relation, or can't find statistics for it. Estimate
			 * using just the type info.
			 */
			item_width = get_typavgwidth(var->vartype, var->vartypmod);
			Assert(item_width > 0);
			rel->attr_widths[ndx] = item_width;
			tuple_width += item_width;
		}
		else if (IsA(node, PlaceHolderVar))
		{
			PlaceHolderVar *phv = (PlaceHolderVar *) node;
			PlaceHolderInfo *phinfo = find_placeholder_info(root, phv, false);

			tuple_width += phinfo->ph_width;
		}
		else
		{
			/*
			 * We could be looking at an expression pulled up from a subquery,
			 * or a ROW() representing a whole-row child Var, etc.  Do what
			 * we can using the expression type information.
			 */
			int32		item_width;

			item_width = get_typavgwidth(exprType(node), exprTypmod(node));
			Assert(item_width > 0);
			tuple_width += item_width;
		}
	}
	Assert(tuple_width >= 0);
	rel->width = tuple_width;
}

/*
 * relation_byte_size
 *	  Estimate the storage space in bytes for a given number of tuples
 *	  of a given width (size in bytes).
 */
static double
relation_byte_size(double tuples, int width)
{
	return tuples * (MAXALIGN(width) + MAXALIGN(sizeof(HeapTupleHeaderData)));
}

/*
 * page_size
 *	  Returns an estimate of the number of pages covered by a given
 *	  number of tuples of a given width (size in bytes).
 */
static double
page_size(double tuples, int width)
{
	return ceil(relation_byte_size(tuples, width) / BLCKSZ);
}
